Pure Comedy in the Morning
Why, Father John,
still?
Some 10-verse chorus-less diatribe/Plays as they all
jump ship, “I used to like this guy/This new shit really kinda makes me wanna
die.” Well, sort of, yes.
I read a
good while ago, in the music magazine Uncut I think, that Father John Misty originally wanted to leave Fleet Foxes to write a novel, an attempt doomed to
wither and turn into a fully-fledged first solo album, Fear Fun, under this
new, assumed identity. There was the beginning of a written work in the liner
notes, and it was a fun way of looking at the act of writing, and how each and
one of us has to think for ourselves what it is going to mean in our specific
case.
Scott
Walker. David Crosby. Harry Nilsson. Paul Simon. Sufjan Stevens. Even as remote
as an influence as the British story-telling band Pulp, and the
quintessential indie-art-pop master Belle and Sebastian come to mind with what
Father John Misty is doing. Songs are stories, always, and some tell these
stories more eloquently than others. Songs are not meant to be short-stories,
nor are they, for heaven’s sake, meant to be novels.
So why’d
you do it, Father John Misty? It’s your third record, and still it is hugely
over-packed, pseudo-confessional and kind of preaching, even more so than
before. I get that if you need to get something off your chest, it is best to
let it out and not let it fester. But every
song?
No one
wants to hear a bunch of angry, bearded, long-haired men screaming about
whatever it is that they are angry about before one’s first cup of joe. I mean
come on. If I wanted to get up angry I would put on rap music. When Beyoncé was
mad at her man, she created her masterpiece, Lemonade, and there is one
(okay arguably two, if you count Freedom) angry song on it. And what a song it
is! Let’s face it, Jack White should just be crowned king of the collaboration
game right now.
And as for
the bearded, long-haired men making music, listen to Matthew E. White. You
can’t listen to his music without smiling. And that doesn’t make his stuff
irrelevant. For months now, my man puts on Gentlewoman, Ruby Man, a
collaboration of cover songs with Flo Morrissey, in his car when he drives to
work, telling me that he is always in a better mood after hearing Look at What the Light Did Now first
thing in the morning. And while my man may be devoid of a beard, he is an angry
man by nature, and I am so happy to have introduced him to something that puts
a smile on his beautiful face. The way I’m grimacing over his disillusioned
contemplations, I’m thinking Father Misty poured himself a tad much johnlennons
in his morning cereal.
In my
opinion, the Beatles created a whole that surpassed the sum of its parts by
miles and miles, and while Father Misty’s namesake Lennon was able to overcome
his limitations as a songsmith (that’s right, V, bring it on!) better than the
rest of the lot, to the point of quickly achieving the status of a true,
authentic solo artist the way the others never really seemed to be able to
secure, even he did suffer, from time to time, from the absence of a
collaborator who would give a lightness, some feeling of counterpoint, of
juxtaposition, to complement his angry, sneering intellect. We all know he was extremely
smart, passionate, and artistic, and an all-round genius, but just look at A Day in the Life.
Without
Paul, John became an even angrier a man with a guitar, than he always had been.
Sometimes he was divine, sometimes he was crass. And vice versa, most
definitely. Without John, Paul has never been able to really make his songs work
on a deeper level. Paul can do melody, John did substance, and while I know
it’s not that simple, and the piano on Oh
Yoko! is one of the most beautiful piano intros I have ever heard, I think
the division still stands. Of course, George went somewhere completely
different on his solo albums, and Ringo, the big enjoyer of life, has done
stuff, yes, but he has been the one Beatle who knows how to sit back and have a
marvelous dinner. Out of all four, he is also the best story-teller, as can be
witnessed on the pivotal documentary series The Anthology.
But back
to Father John Misty and his always the same chord progressions and similar
melodies and subject matter. Listen to his music for ten seconds and you’ll
instantly know it’s him - which isn't, by all means, always a bad thing, to possess a distinctive sound. Now I know my Grand Old Man, Woody Allen, pretty much
has three or four different kinds of plots, and he basically makes the same
three or four movies over and over, sometimes using even the same kind of
dialogue (just check “polymorphously perverse”!), so I understand I really
shouldn’t be the one bitching about this, but I don’t know. I’m bored with
Father John Misty, and sick of his voice, come the last song of the album. I
can’t get into it. I just can’t. His anger and disenchantment just don’t match
mine. What can I say, he’s not my angst. He does have a beautiful voice, and he
has the gift of story-telling. But I just think David Crosby and Sufjan Stevens
do this sort of thing in a more interesting way, the highly produced, rich,
psychedelic story-telling, the complex, instrument-loaded, narrative music.
Give me 30 Century Man by Scott
Walker any day over the tiresome Leaving
LA, the above quoted song. My favorite line on Pure Comedy comes from the
same long song: She’s like: “Oh great,
that’s just what we all need/Another white guy in 2017/Who takes himself so
goddamn seriously/She’s not far off.
To seek
forgiveness from all the outraged Lennon fans, I give you my humble top five
from his solo work. Every one of these songs has an outstanding melody, and
while rumor has it that John hated his own voice, and wanted to record dual
tracks of his singing, thus making it less thin, I specifically love his
timbre, and the pastel color scheme of his sound on these tracks, and as an
instrument of love, John Lennon’s voice, I think, has no real rivals.
Six:
(because where’s the fun if I don’t follow through on an already established
fallacy!) It’s a tie: Whatever Gets You
Thru the Night and Nobody Told Me. John
at his funniest, and so groovy! Life’s a bitch but it’s okay is what I take out
of these songs, and I just love the wackiness and uncharacteristic glee, a rare
gem glimmering in these songs.
Five: Jealous Guy. I have loved this song
since when I was young and really had no real idea what it was about. Kind of
like with Imagine, its power lies in
its nakedness, the sadness and melancholy, and the way he can create an ocean
of regret and sorrow with the littlest hassle; it is simply beyond me.
Four: Oh Yoko! As stated above, the piano on
this song is so beautiful, and I adore the deceitful simplicity of this. I know
people, fans of the man and the group, who are so sick already with John’s
unending dedication and commitment to his one true love, and while I, too, have
had my ups and downs with John’s love songs, I can’t get over how utterly
romantic it is, in the end, to have somebody record your love story so
earnestly and with such tenderness. In
the middle of the night I call your name. So beautiful!
Three: Mind Games. A song that has a special
meaning for me. Yes is the answer is
a line that should be out there much more.
Two: Another
two-parter: Woman and Working Class Hero. Lennon’s two
important and all-infiltrating themes. The latter is without a doubt on any
music man’s top five Lennon list, and there truly is a piercing, somber quality
to his guitar and voice, a disenchantment dressed not in monumental melodic
passages or long, complex narrative, but in an almost ascetic feel of a torch
song, even if the story isn’t this time about romantic love at all. The former
is a song that every woman would love to hear requested by their lover. A
simple song, no frills, no secrets, only love.
One: Look at Me, because it makes me cry.
(Yeah, I
know I was cheating, really. It’s so hard to pick just five.)
Comments
Post a Comment